A shoe hurled at Chief Justice B.R. Gavai sparked courtroom drama. Here’s the full story, reactions, and what it means for India’s judiciary.
- 👞 The Shoe Thrower: Rakesh Kishore and His ‘Divine’ Claim
- ⚖️ What Really Happened in Court
- 👩👦 Mother’s Stern Words — A Call for Restraint
- 🏛️ Legal Consequences — Bar Council Steps In
- 🇮🇳 PM Modi’s Reaction — Justice First
- ✨ Why This Incident Matters
- 💡 Quick Recap of the Incident
- 🌐 Related Authority on Judicial Conduct
- 📌 Featured Snippet-Friendly FAQs
- Q1: Who threw a shoe at CJI B.R. Gavai?
- Q2: Why did Rakesh Kishore throw the shoe?
- Q3: How did the CJI react to the shoe attack?
- Q4: What action did the Bar Council take?
- Q5: What did CJI Gavai’s mother say about the attack?
- ✍️ Writing Takeaway
CJI Shoe Attack — When a Courtroom Turned Into a Stage
Ever thought India’s Supreme Court could have its own Bollywood-style twist? On a calm Monday, the country’s highest courtroom briefly turned into a scene straight out of a movie — a shoe was allegedly hurled at Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai. Yes, you read that right — a shoe!
The incident was shocking, dramatic, and, frankly, a moment that left everyone wide-eyed. Here’s everything you need to know — from who threw the shoe to what the Chief Justice did next.
👞 The Shoe Thrower: Rakesh Kishore and His ‘Divine’ Claim
The man at the center of this unexpected drama was Rakesh Kishore, a 71-year-old Supreme Court advocate. According to media reports, Kishore claimed that the Almighty guided his action. Speaking a day later, he said:
The Almighty made it happen, I only did what happened; I had no role in it… I was just a witness; what happened, happened.
His explanation stunned many. He also referred to a remark made by CJI Gavai during a September 16 hearing, where he alleged the Chief Justice mocked Sanatan Dharma. Kishore claimed his act carried a “hidden message.”
⚖️ What Really Happened in Court
On October 6, during routine case mentions, Kishore reportedly approached the dais, removed his shoe, and attempted to hurl it towards the judges. Security personnel reacted swiftly, stopping the shoe before it could reach the bench led by CJI Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran.
Despite the chaos, the CJI remained calm. Reports say he instructed court staff to “ignore it” and let the lawyer off with a warning — showing composure under unexpected pressure.
That’s some serious judicial coolness!
👩👦 Mother’s Stern Words — A Call for Restraint
If the courtroom was shaken, the family wasn’t silent either. Dr Kamal Gavai, the CJI’s mother, condemned the attack and issued a warning against such actions.
She said:
I condemn the shoe thrown at CJI. The Indian Constitution gives equal rights to all, but some people, taking the law into their own hands, behave in a manner that is disrespectful and can spread anarchy.
She urged citizens to express dissent peacefully, reminding everyone that no one has the right to resort to such acts. Her message resonated strongly with those who believe in democratic dialogue over aggression.
🏛️ Legal Consequences — Bar Council Steps In
The Bar Council of India swiftly responded to the incident. It has suspended Rakesh Kishore’s license pending an investigation. Police are also probing the motive behind his actions and whether there’s more to the story.
Such disciplinary actions send a strong message — the courtroom is no place for impulsive theatrics.
🇮🇳 PM Modi’s Reaction — Justice First
Prime Minister Narendra Modi also reached out to CJI Gavai, expressing his condemnation and concern. He reportedly said the attack “has angered every Indian” and praised the CJI for staying composed.
Modi emphasized that respect for the judiciary is crucial to democracy and said the government stands firmly with the judiciary to protect the values of justice and constitutional spirit.
✨ Why This Incident Matters
The incident may look like a bizarre one-off event, but it highlights several deeper concerns:
- Respect for Judiciary: The Supreme Court is the backbone of democracy. Attacks, even symbolic, weaken that trust.
- Freedom vs Anarchy: Freedom of expression doesn’t mean freedom to physically threaten.
- Need for Security: Courtrooms may now rethink security measures to prevent such sudden disruptions.
It’s a reminder that while dissent is essential, disruption isn’t democracy.
💡 Quick Recap of the Incident
- Advocate Rakesh Kishore allegedly threw a shoe at CJI B.R. Gavai.
- He claimed “God made it happen” and referred to religious remarks from a past hearing.
- Security stopped the shoe mid-drama; CJI stayed calm and ignored it.
- The Bar Council suspended Kishore’s license.
- PM Modi and the CJI’s mother condemned the act, urging peaceful expression.
🌐 Related Authority on Judicial Conduct
For those curious about the judiciary’s code of conduct and security in courts, you can check the Supreme Court of India’s official website for authentic updates and guidelines.
When someone said “throwing shade,” this lawyer probably misheard and decided to throw a shoe instead. Not cool. Not clever. Definitely not lawful.
“Shoes are for walking — not for courtroom stunts.”
📌 Featured Snippet-Friendly FAQs
Q1: Who threw a shoe at CJI B.R. Gavai?
Advocate Rakesh Kishore, a 71-year-old lawyer, attempted to throw a shoe at Chief Justice B.R. Gavai during court proceedings on October 6.
Q2: Why did Rakesh Kishore throw the shoe?
Kishore claimed he acted under divine direction and was upset about remarks allegedly made by the CJI during a September 16 hearing.
Q3: How did the CJI react to the shoe attack?
CJI Gavai stayed calm, instructed court staff to ignore the incident, and did not let it disrupt proceedings.
Q4: What action did the Bar Council take?
The Bar Council of India suspended Kishore’s license pending investigation.
Q5: What did CJI Gavai’s mother say about the attack?
Dr Kamal Gavai condemned the act, calling it disrespectful and warning it could spread anarchy if people take the law into their own hands.
✍️ Writing Takeaway
India’s courts may be known for long legal battles and intense debates, but Monday’s shoe-throwing drama was unexpected. Yet it showed us one thing — calm leadership matters. CJI Gavai’s dignified response turned what could have been chaos into a moment of grace.
What’s your take on this dramatic courtroom moment?
Do you think India needs stricter courtroom security, or should we focus on better public legal awareness instead?
💬 Share your thoughts in the comments.
🔔 Follow Nokjhok for more crisp, witty, and insightful news breakdowns.
📢 Pass this story on — because democracy works better when everyone knows what’s going on.
Related Post Suggestion
👉 “When a King Travels Like a Rock Concert: King Mswati III’s Grand Abu Dhabi Entry”
